Clinical Evidence
Precision-GI™ has been used in over 400 EUS-guided biopsy procedures performed at leading international endoscopy centers and its performance has been validated through several clinical trials.
EUS-SKYLINE: Live Case
“This will be very revolutionary for tissue quality”
Carlos Robles-Medranda, MD
Head of Endoscopy Services, IECED Medical Center
01 / Case Studies
Case Studies
Pancreatic Masses
Open case study ↗
Vascular Pancreas Mass
Open case study ↗
Pancreas Mass and Jaundice
Open case study ↗
Abnormal Liver Tests
Open case study ↗02 / Live Cases
Live Cases
03 / RESEARCH
Research
RESEARCH 01
Evaluation of a Novel Motorized EUS-FNB Device: A Prospective Pilot Study
Read More →
RESEARCH 02
Pilot study comparing a novel EUS-guided motorized biopsy needle technique with traditional sampling
Read More →
RESEARCH 03
Application of a novel endoscopic ultrasound–guided motorized fine needle for liver and pancreatic lesion biopsy
Read More →FIH CLINICAL TRIAL
Precision-GI™ Technology vs. Leading Manual Needles*
PRECISION-GI™ EUS Biopsy
Manual EUS-FNB
Sampling Time
(Minutes)
PRECISION-GI™
3.87
(p=0.001)
FASTER
MANUAL
5.64
Total Procedure Average: Motorized Actuations vs. Manual Needle Actuations
PRECISION-GI™
5
(p=0.00002)
1/10 ACTUATIONS
MANUAL
55
Histology Score Average
(Scale of 1-5, 5 being the best)
PRECISION-GI™
4.6/5
(p=0.002)
HIGHER HISTOLOGY SCORE
MANUAL
3.2/5
* N=9. Dornblaser DW, Khamaysi I, Gross SA. Pilot study comparing a novel EUS-guided motorized biopsy needle technique with traditional sampling. IGIE. 2023 Apr 26;2(2):126-130. doi: 10.1016/j.igie.2023.03.005.
CLINICAL TRIAL · IECED MEDICAL CENTER
Preliminary Results
PROSPECTIVE STUDY
40
patient prospective study
Conducted in patients with pancreatic masses and liver lesions
97.5%
Technical Success
95%
Adequate Samples
#
MEASUREMENT
PAIRED BARS
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
VALUE
01
Lower Rate of Blood Contamination
25% vs. 65% with manual needles
Precision-GI™
25%
Manual needles
65%
02
Larger Core Fragments
30% of fragments >10mm vs. only 15% with manual needles
Precision-GI™
30%
Manual needles
15%
03
Excellent biopsy results
Average tumor content of ~70% vs. 10-20% with manual needles
Precision-GI™
~70%
Manual needles
10-20%
*Robles-Medranda, C., et al. (2025). Evaluation of a novel motorized EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy device and pathology quality parameters comparison to standard fine-needle biopsy: A prospective pilot study. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 101(5), S592–S593.